Skaffa Premium för att gömma alla reklamer
Inlägg: 79   Besökt av: 141 users

Det ursprungliga inlägget

Inlagd av SyrianDevil, 24.01.2018 - 12:10
Why LB inf + militia have no nerfs but boosts with 10 critical?
either they should get only 5 criticals or lb inf should cost 70 but those tanking infantry that are very fast are absurd everybody is using LB all around of europe except for turkey i dont hear anybody mentioning the over usage of this free boost strategy whats the point of none then?
with the benefits must come the resolutions and actually 5 LB tanks have bigger chance on defeating 8 militia then DS helicopters think about it....
DS is op? i guess LB tanks are more powerful/faster/transportable/defensive then DS helicopters
seriously lb is free boost strategy that needs some balancing to stop the cancerous LB spams all around
26.01.2018 - 16:20
Blah blah blah stfu for once you noob and stop whinning, literaly every fucking thread u make is complaining or crying about somthing and having a bitchass fit till the next fucking shit u post..
Laddar...
Laddar...
26.01.2018 - 16:27
I wish mods would do their job
----
Our next Moments are Tomorrows Memories
Laddar...
Laddar...
26.01.2018 - 16:28
Indeed mods tell syrian to stick to 1 thread for his bitching fits please
Laddar...
Laddar...
26.01.2018 - 16:46
Skrivet av SyrianDevil, 26.01.2018 at 16:27

I wish mods would do their job

i agree
Laddar...
Laddar...
27.01.2018 - 10:32
 Eagle (Mod)
Yeah LB seriously needs to be nerfed, this just got out of hand. LB has become IF with bigger range and better critical. Just now 19 inf 4 tanks 7 mil at and a gen LB attacked 22 inf and a gen IF in defense, 5 mil at and a gen surviving. LB has an op defense, even stronger attack, it can outmaneuver almost any current strat, either on EU or bigger maps. I suggest you either reduce the critical or add back the +10 cost to the units.
----
Laddar...
Laddar...
27.01.2018 - 14:02
 Witch-Doctor (Mod)
Skrivet av Eagle, 27.01.2018 at 10:32

Yeah LB seriously needs to be nerfed, this just got out of hand. LB has become IF with bigger range and better critical. Just now 19 inf 4 tanks 7 mil at and a gen LB attacked 22 inf and a gen IF in defense, 5 mil at and a gen surviving. LB has an op defense, even stronger attack, it can outmaneuver almost any current strat, either on EU or bigger maps. I suggest you either reduce the critical or add back the +10 cost to the units.


You would have won if you had 1 more unit defending.
Laddar...
Laddar...
27.01.2018 - 22:34
Why PD inf + militia have no nerfs but boosts with 2 defence?
either they should get only 1 defence (against tanks) or pd inf should cost 60 but those tanking infantry that are very fast are absurd everybody is using PD all around of europe even with turkey i dont hear anybody mentioning the over usage of this free boost strategy whats the point of none then?
with the benefits must come the resolutions and actually 5 PD inf have bigger chance on defeating 10 attacking inf than LB inf think about it....
LB is op? i guess PD inf are more powerful/transportable/defensive then LB inf
seriously PD is free boost strategy that needs some balancing to stop the cancerous PD spams all around


Seriously, apply this logic to any strategy and you can conclude it needs a nerf.
Being easier to play well means that more people can play it well, but that doesn't mean it is overpowered.
----

Laddar...
Laddar...
28.01.2018 - 12:00
I suggest + 15 more crit to LB
----
The enemy is in front of us, the enemy is behind us, the enemy is to the right and left of us. They cant get away this time! - General Douglas Mcarthur

Laddar...
Laddar...
29.01.2018 - 13:21
 Eagle (Mod)


LB vs PD, nothing more to add
----
Laddar...
Laddar...
29.01.2018 - 13:41
 Witch-Doctor (Mod)
Skrivet av Eagle, 29.01.2018 at 13:21



LB vs PD, nothing more to add


Seriously if you had 1 more you could have won.
Laddar...
Laddar...
29.01.2018 - 13:54
 4nic
Stop crying eagle 6 tanks are supposed to do that.

Not to mention how i had 20 troops vs your 16 LOL

The more surprising thing about that SS is how i had killed 1 inf with 1 milita in cologne.
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon


Laddar...
Laddar...
29.01.2018 - 14:24
Gal
Kontot borttaget
Skrivet av 4nic, 29.01.2018 at 13:54

Stop crying eagle 6 tanks are supposed to do that.

Not to mention how i had 20 troops vs your 16 LOL

The more surprising thing about that SS is how i had killed 1 inf with 1 milita in cologne.


Kind of agree with nic.

The most surprising, in that ss, is that nic is e-list and ignored, then Eagle cannot even see his answer, the reason why i quote it.

Nic and Eagle are both good guys
Laddar...
Laddar...
29.01.2018 - 16:17
 Eagle (Mod)
And then, not only does it have an op attack, it has an op defense aswell

----
Laddar...
Laddar...
29.01.2018 - 17:36
Skrivet av 4nic, 29.01.2018 at 13:54

Stop crying eagle 6 tanks are supposed to do that.

Not to mention how i had 20 troops vs your 16 LOL

The more surprising thing about that SS is how i had killed 1 inf with 1 milita in cologne.


lmao no, 6 tanks are not meant to do that to pd units. Those rolls are outrageous.
----
Laddar...
Laddar...
30.01.2018 - 04:01
Gal
Kontot borttaget
Skrivet av Eagle, 29.01.2018 at 16:17

And then, not only does it have an op attack, it has an op defense aswell




Must say that this one is outrageous.

The other one on Paris was actually common but this last Oo
Laddar...
Laddar...
30.01.2018 - 04:01
Gal
Kontot borttaget
Skrivet av Eagle, 29.01.2018 at 16:17

And then, not only does it have an op attack, it has an op defense aswell




Must say that this one is outrageous.

The other one on Paris was actually common but this last Oo
Laddar...
Laddar...
30.01.2018 - 11:43
 Witch-Doctor (Mod)
Skrivet av Guest, 30.01.2018 at 04:01

Skrivet av Eagle, 29.01.2018 at 16:17

And then, not only does it have an op attack, it has an op defense aswell




Must say that this one is outrageous.

The other one on Paris was actually common but this last Oo



That screenshot doesnt show anything. For all we know eagle could have attacked with 107 militia 1 inf 1 tank 1 gen 1 air trans
Laddar...
Laddar...
30.01.2018 - 12:08
Skrivet av Witch-Doctor, 30.01.2018 at 11:43

Skrivet av Guest, 30.01.2018 at 04:01

Skrivet av Eagle, 29.01.2018 at 16:17

And then, not only does it have an op attack, it has an op defense aswell




Must say that this one is outrageous.

The other one on Paris was actually common but this last Oo



That screenshot doesnt show anything. For all we know eagle could have attacked with 107 militia 1 inf 1 tank 1 gen 1 air trans

or 1 militia 1 inf 1 tank 1 at and 107 gens
who knows
----
Do you fear death? Do you fear that dark abyss? All your deeds laid bare. All your sins punished.
Laddar...
Laddar...
30.01.2018 - 12:16
Skrivet av Eagle, 29.01.2018 at 16:17

And then, not only does it have an op attack, it has an op defense aswell



60inf 50mil 2tanks vs 50inf 2ATS 1 bomber rest militia.
Laddar...
Laddar...
30.01.2018 - 19:23
 Eagle (Mod)


Lb attacking pd
----
Laddar...
Laddar...
30.01.2018 - 19:58
 Witch-Doctor (Mod)
Skrivet av Eagle, 30.01.2018 at 19:23



Lb attacking pd


If you had 1 more you would have won.
Laddar...
Laddar...
31.01.2018 - 01:00
Skrivet av 4nic, 29.01.2018 at 13:54

Stop crying eagle 6 tanks are supposed to do that.

Not to mention how i had 20 troops vs your 16 LOL

The more surprising thing about that SS is how i had killed 1 inf with 1 milita in cologne.

firstlyz it be surprisingz seez

secondly you have just admitted dat LBz iz outrageouz by claiming dat diz iz normalz
but it be at war'z random rollz systemz massin + deludin us broz.. tehehehehhehe
Laddar...
Laddar...
31.01.2018 - 01:01
Skrivet av Witch-Doctor, 30.01.2018 at 11:43

Skrivet av Guest, 30.01.2018 at 04:01

Skrivet av Eagle, 29.01.2018 at 16:17

And then, not only does it have an op attack, it has an op defense aswell




Must say that this one is outrageous.

The other one on Paris was actually common but this last Oo



That screenshot doesnt show anything. For all we know eagle could have attacked with 107 militia 1 inf 1 tank 1 gen 1 air trans

still if he sent 2 more he would have wonz tehehehehehehe
Laddar...
Laddar...
31.01.2018 - 01:14
Skrivet av LukeTan, 27.01.2018 at 22:34

Why PD inf + militia have no nerfs but boosts with 2 defence?
either they should get only 1 defence (against tanks) or pd inf should cost 60 but those tanking infantry that are very fast are absurd everybody is using PD all around of europe even with turkey i dont hear anybody mentioning the over usage of this free boost strategy whats the point of none then?
with the benefits must come the resolutions and actually 5 PD inf have bigger chance on defeating 10 attacking inf than LB inf think about it....
LB is op? i guess PD inf are more powerful/transportable/defensive then LB inf
seriously PD is free boost strategy that needs some balancing to stop the cancerous PD spams all around


Seriously, apply this logic to any strategy and you can conclude it needs a nerf.
Being easier to play well means that more people can play it well, but that doesn't mean it is overpowered.


i do only see + + + + and not any - except for the tankz(da one dat matterz) but i believe dat +12% chancez to do +8 damage every hitz be worthy morez den +10 costz
be addin dat all of lb unitz has as good offensive as its defensive rollz in da game D

now letz compare it to PD



Results:
1- lb inf are better at attackingz den pd infz
2- LB tankz be worthy likez 2 pd tankz so arez bomberz as dey be +14 critical more den PD unitz
3- +10% free +6 damagez chance +1 range seems betterz at defendingz den +1 defz D


you be wildin out broz tehehehehehehehehehehe
Laddar...
Laddar...
31.01.2018 - 18:27
 Eagle (Mod)


Totally legit for 5 tanks to kill 17 inf
----
Laddar...
Laddar...
31.01.2018 - 20:09
 Witch-Doctor (Mod)
Skrivet av Eagle, 31.01.2018 at 18:27



Totally legit for 5 tanks to kill 17 inf


He's blitz you noob.
Laddar...
Laddar...
31.01.2018 - 20:44
Skrivet av Witch-Doctor, 31.01.2018 at 20:09

Skrivet av Eagle, 31.01.2018 at 18:27



Totally legit for 5 tanks to kill 17 inf


He's blitz you noob.

He was imperialist
Laddar...
Laddar...
01.02.2018 - 04:30
Skrivet av Wheelo, 31.01.2018 at 20:44

Skrivet av Witch-Doctor, 31.01.2018 at 20:09

Skrivet av Eagle, 31.01.2018 at 18:27



Totally legit for 5 tanks to kill 17 inf


He's blitz you noob.

He was imperialist

Tanks with gen op
Laddar...
Laddar...
01.02.2018 - 04:55
When people get used to their "LB rolls" so 4 tanks killing 16 pd units is something completely normal and expected.
Laddar...
Laddar...
01.02.2018 - 09:50
 4nic
Skrivet av Eagle, 31.01.2018 at 18:27



Totally legit for 5 tanks to kill 17 inf

oh noes!! 5 tanks killed 17 infs
almost as if stack bonus and general werent the reason behind that.




Nerf imperialist, 4 infs had killed off my 5 LB tanks, this is unbelievable
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon


Laddar...
Laddar...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Integritet | Användarvillkor | Bannare | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Följ oss på

sprid vidare