15.05.2019 - 20:19
Serbia was doing a genocide... I don't give a rat's ass what people in the Balkans do as long they they don't kill each other and don't restrict human rights. The US government feels the same way, even with its flaws.
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
16.05.2019 - 06:05 >US government cares about muh human rights and not killing each other how young are you?
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
16.05.2019 - 06:23 Only they are allowed to kill obv. Do as they say not as they do.
---- We are not the same- I am a Martian.
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
16.05.2019 - 11:14
Felt*, at least in the case of the Balkans. Other places may be different.
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
16.05.2019 - 16:31
It is obvious you are just trolling here, no source provided whatsoever, just parrot repeating same words globalists use for the last 20 years. Racak was considered the final straw for USA to invade, which was only week later proven as propaganda, by US ally - France. https://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/1999/01/21/les-morts-de-racak-ont-ils-vraiment-ete-massacres-froidement_3533047_1819218.html?xtmc=kosovo&xtcr=7 Neutral forensic working there was pressured and threatened by US colonial governor, Helena Ranta had to obey and falsify the report so USA can justify invasion, 15 years later she revealed it. http://www.kosovocompromise.com/cms/item/analysis/en.html?view=story&id=1456§ionId=2 I know posting all this is in vain, since you are brainwashed to the death, unable to reform and use your brain to think and do your own research, your mushy brain is molded that way since you were born. Otherwise you wouldn't reply like a bot, insulting others and yourself.
---- If a game is around long enough, people will find the most efficient way to play it and start playing it like robots
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
16.05.2019 - 17:34
Lol you're the one parroting things with no evidence. In any case Milosevic was a vicious genocider. I'm glad his troops were bombed. Do you think serbians are more valuable than albanians or something? Both are human beings.
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
16.05.2019 - 18:22
Again, you are parroting globalist propaganda, maybe you're paid to spread fake news? No troops were bombed, they aimed for civilians and infrastructure, worth 100 billion dollars [http://prntscr.com/npkzva], only 5% of serbian military power was destroyed (apparently USA cant find troops unless they are in the open desert like Iraq, so they revenge on civilians) 3 years old dead https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milica_Raki%C4%87 US targeting civilians with Geneva banned munition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ni%C5%A1_cluster_bombing Another civilian target https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grdelica_train_bombing Another civilian target https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_bombing_of_Novi_Sad Another civilian target https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_bombing_of_the_Radio_Television_of_Serbia_headquarters This is last time i reply if you don't start posting sources to back up your claims, until then your words remain invalidated, and you can pat yourself on the shoulder for earning another food stamp by posting fake news from troll factory.
---- If a game is around long enough, people will find the most efficient way to play it and start playing it like robots
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
16.05.2019 - 19:21
You're posting random anecdotes. I could also talk about the Srebrenica Massacre, in which 8,000 people was massacred by the Serbia you seem to love so much. In any case, Serbia was stopped and a somewhat unstable peace was restored. I'm not against or for any country in the Balkans but you have to recognize that the US had to intervene for the sake of innocents being murdered by Serbia.
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
16.05.2019 - 20:22
That's not why the US intervened... or you can believe the media. Look into the timeline though and you'll see the US mislead people to support yet another war. Andartes isn't completely wrong on this. [Though i completely disagree with the initial post and how he presented this as being related to the ND fire.] But some more wikipedia links are listed below in case you want to start looking into it... When western friendly information services such as wikipedia conflict with the 'official media version' of what happened, and support Andartes version of events, you gotta at least suspend judgment and do some digging. Don't get me wrong - in Canada i listened to the media and thought the same as you when it was first reported.... but the truth is there for those who want to look. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legitimacy_of_the_NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosovo_War
----
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
16.05.2019 - 23:29
No wonder the US is tending towards isolationism, the rest of the world is full of a bunch of fucking lunatics who spew senseless propaganda to push agendas that are irrelevant to serious issues.
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
njab Kontot borttaget |
17.05.2019 - 11:01 njab Kontot borttaget
And what is US doing meanwhile, turning itself into a country full of fucking lunatics who spew senseless propaganda to push agendas that are irrelevant to the serious issues?
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
17.05.2019 - 13:46
Don't waste your words on him, he's braindead. Now he mentions another war and blame Serbia again, the guy is serbophobe.
You're in lose-lose situation. American leftists push for isolationism, which is good foreign policy, but they will ruin your country from the inside. Other camp is pushing for interventionism, thus exhausting America to the bankrupcy. United States and Soviet Union were doomed to fall.
---- If a game is around long enough, people will find the most efficient way to play it and start playing it like robots
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
17.05.2019 - 15:35
USA doesn't even know what the balkans are xD. I think people here are arguing just for the sake of arguing. Americans don't even know what is going on in the Balkans nor have a stake in it unless they immigrated from there.
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
17.05.2019 - 15:39
Maybe the US did bomb the wrong targets; if that is true, then the US can be criticized for it. I'm just failing to understand how attacking a country in order to stop it from killing thousands of innocent civilians is a bad thing. If the US actually did attack innocents instead of military targets though, feel free to criticize it all you want. No country is above criticism and every country should be a country free of genocides. US was right to attack Serbian military targets (at least those of Milosevic etc) that were directly engaging in genocide. But I agree that the US should not have attacked civilians. There was no need to attack innocents and it's a bad thing when innocents die, no matter whether they are Bosnian, Serb, Kosovan etc.
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
17.05.2019 - 15:43
I'm not serbophobe, just anti-Milosovic and his ilk. I agree with you that innocent Serbian civilians should not have been bombed. The US should have only attacked military targets directly engaged in mass murders.
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
17.05.2019 - 15:49 If other places are different, I think the inconsistency testifies if not help proves that the US Government, like most governments, doesn't really care about ''human rights'' or other Enlightenment fiction unironically. Rather, they had their own interests they wanted to enforce. I can think up one off at the top of my head. Syrian and Serbian territory can actually be in the way of a pipeline for gas that would threaten Russia economically very harshly.
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
17.05.2019 - 16:25
Speaking of pipeline, Germany says US treats it like a colony (due to Germany wish to importi Russian gas, US wants to stop it): http://english.almanar.com.lb/738344 And that reminds me of this, Poland stopped purchasing Russian cheap gas, and importing US lng for double the price https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/26/business/poland-gas-lng-russia-usa.html I mean it's not like we live in capitalism, so we seek to buy best quality-to-cost product, right.
---- If a game is around long enough, people will find the most efficient way to play it and start playing it like robots
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
22.05.2019 - 12:30
Dude, if their company builds our highway it doesn't mean that it is a loan. And no, they do not own our port.
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
09.06.2019 - 16:11
Hundreds of arson attacks against churches in France and thousands of examples of desecration towards French and Christian symbols. Everyone knows this was an arson attack by a particular group of religious radicals. The authorities denies arson within hours despite no proper investigation. Authorities also revealed two fires took place. How could two fires occur at the same time on opposite sides of the Cathedral? Nonsense. Workers have to take extra care with renovation and the coincidence of two fires from equipment at the same time on opposite ends is the worst explanation. It was clearly arson and likely committed by the same groups of Islamic radicals who burn others churches in France. The French state is already in upheaval due to months of yellow vest protests, riots and economic warfare. If the French public knew the truth, it would have sparked a nationwide crisis. They are just delaying the inevitable.
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
|
10.06.2019 - 10:14
is there a good source that there were two fires? i.e. did the Fire Dept acknowledge this? Having hard time finding this ...
----
Laddar...
Laddar...
|
Är du säker?