Inlägg där jag är citerad

I brought GW as a rank 4 and tried it once. Was all like: "wtf is this, this is the worst strat ever." and I never took the time to learn how to use it. This is a great foundation for me to learn the strategy and I appreciate you posting this!

One question though; In something like a CW or a typical 3V3 EU+ with extra cities, what country would be good with it? I'm assuming Turkey would be one, but are there others?

Very interested in this clan. I'd like to join. I'm down with a 1V1 or something if you need to test my skills or whatever. Hopefully, we'll be in touch.

JKTD you dumb fuck.

Not once have I rouged as UN. You can ask Neptune, egg, Joedtaxi, foodiefighter, Edwards, and everybody else I've played with in UN. So stop talking shit and trying to ruin my rep.

I have only played one game of UN with JKTD. So to say I repeatedly rouge is of course a lie.

Stupid noob.

-.-

It would be helpful if you guys explained what you don't like about the rules. Kinda the point of me posting this..

It's fine if you guys hate it, just be constructive about it.

I understand there's a lot of hate (as well as likes) for the UN games. UN games promote easy SP for doing relatively nothing and not posing a real challenge as 4-12 of the remaining players choose to allyend. I was thinking of creating a UN game with new rules (similar look though) to fix these issues as well as a few issues I have with the game.

So, here we go.

1.) Anybody who has not war'd somebody by turn 25 is subject to termination by UN.
2.) UNs may only invade the players main Cap if that player is rouge or subject to termination. (UNs get much less SP this way) and no other countries that belong to that rouge player/ player subject to termination.
3.) If a player is a rouge, anybody may attack that players country (except for UN. UN may only Cap)
4.) UNs may not deny war unless there is good reason too.
4a.) Reasons include insufficient time to prepare, other player has already massed troops near your country, and more than one player has declared war on you.
5.) You may not attack any other country unless it is neutral, or UN has accepted war.
6.) All neutral countries are ffa
7.) Loans are issued by UNs only to supply troops for war. Loans may not exceed 10k
8.) UNs may not own land.
9.) When 8 players are left, WW3 is automatically issued.
10.) UNs may not interfere in WW3
11.) WW3 may end when there are 4 or less players who wish to allyend.
12.) At no point can anyone attack a UN unless that UN is rouge.

So, there's my idea. What do you guys think?

Any company that makes it's money on consumers would be an idiot to affiliate themselves with a political/social issue.

I'm relieved i'm not the only one experiencing this. For a second I thought I was banned for all the racist black jokes I made last night in response to the verdict in the Zimmerman case.

I can't stand playing an EU+ game with ally fags. Especially when France, Spain, UK, and Germany ally each other to rape the eastern countries.